Tensol vs Jama

Keep the requirements system. Fix the evidence gap.

Keep Jama Connect for requirements, reviews, risk, and traceability. Use Tensol where traceability meets physical test data from the bench.

See it with your test data

Different systems of record for different facts.

Jama owns the requirement and review. Tensol verifies what the hardware actually did. The integration preserves the process your team already trusts while making verification status measurable from the underlying data.

Requirements authoring and approval
Jama ConnectPrimary system of record
TensolImports the approved hierarchy and revision
Test planning and cases
Jama ConnectCreates, reviews, organizes, and runs test cases
TensolMaps existing cases to the evidence they produced
Bench data
Jama ConnectIntegrates with test execution and automation tools
TensolIngests .mf4, .tdms, ROS, ULog, CAN, and CSV directly
Verification coverage
Jama ConnectShows linked tests, results, and coverage gaps
TensolComputes coverage from channel-level results and rig entitlement
When a limit changes
Jama ConnectFlags downstream relationships for impact review
TensolRe-scores historical data and identifies exactly what must rerun

What Jama Connect already does well

  • Requirements authoring, reviews, approvals, and reuse
  • Live traceability across requirements, risks, and tests
  • Test planning, test-case management, and compliance reporting

One requirement, after a bench run

requirement

REQ-PWR-021 · rev 5 · ≤ 200 ms

evidence

rig01_precharge_044.mf4 → precharge_complete_ms

measured

412 ms · limit breached by 212 ms

impact

5 requirements unverified · 7 sign-offs stale · 2 cases to re-author

Do not migrate requirements to evaluate Tensol.

Bring one subsystem, its existing requirements, and a handful of representative runs. We will show the evidence chain and computed coverage without replacing Jama Connect.