Tensol vs Polarion
Keep the requirements system. Fix the evidence gap.
Keep Polarion as the governed home for requirements. Use Tensol to connect those requirements to the files, runs, rigs, and channels that prove them.
See it with your test dataDifferent systems of record for different facts.
Polarion owns the requirement. Tensol owns the evidence chain back from the bench. The integration preserves the process your team already trusts while making verification status measurable from the underlying data.
What Polarion ALM already does well
- ✓Requirements authoring, review, baselines, and workflow
- ✓Application lifecycle traceability and governance
- ✓Established processes for large engineering organizations
One requirement, after a bench run
requirement
REQ-PWR-021 · rev 5 · ≤ 200 ms
evidence
rig01_precharge_044.mf4 → precharge_complete_ms
measured
412 ms · limit breached by 212 ms
impact
5 requirements unverified · 7 sign-offs stale · 2 cases to re-author
Do not migrate requirements to evaluate Tensol.
Bring one subsystem, its existing requirements, and a handful of representative runs. We will show the evidence chain and computed coverage without replacing Polarion ALM.